top of page

Case 98

A 54 year old female with a perirenal mass.


ree

ree

ree

ree

1.What's your diagnosis?

A: Well differentiated liposarcoma

B: Dedifferentiated liposarcoma

C: Pleomorphic liposarcoma

D: Reactive fibroblast favor nodular fasciitis

E: Low grade dedifferentiated liposarcoma




Answer

This is a case of well differentiated liposarcoma. If you don't see the lipogenic area, a dedifferentiated liposarcoma is still not favored due to the low mitotic count.


  • Lack of Consensus on DDLPS Criteria:

    • Histologic criteria for DDLPS remain controversial; various definitions are used across studies.

  • Diverse Diagnostic Approaches:

    • Only one group strictly followed Evans’ criterion (≥5 mitoses/10 HPFs) before applying FNCLCC grading.

    • Other studies used:

      • Purely descriptive criteria.

      • Descriptive criteria with modifications to FNCLCC grading.

      • Descriptive approaches without requiring a specific mitotic count.

  • Variability in Defining Low-Grade DDLPS:

    • Some studies use descriptive terms like “low-grade dedifferentiated” or compare with cellular WDLPS.

    • Diagnostic ambiguity affects understanding of the biological behavior and clinical relevance of “low-grade” DDLPS.

  • FNCLCC Grading System Constraints:

    • Once a tumor is labeled DDLPS (given differentiation score 3), its minimum FNCLCC grade is 2.

    • Even with low mitotic activity (e.g., 0–1 mitoses/10 HPFs) and no necrosis, the grade cannot be <2.

    • WDLPS with similar features would be graded as FNCLCC grade 1 due to a lower differentiation score.

  • Diagnostic Inconsistency Risks:

    • Inconsistent criteria lead to nonuniform DDLPS classification, affecting treatment and prognosis evaluations.

  • Evans’ 1979 Mitotic Criterion:

    • The only objective and reproducible criterion: ≥5 mitoses/10 HPFs + presence of NLA (nonlipogenic areas).

    • Evans also showed prognostic differences using this threshold, separating WDLPS from true DDLPS.

  • Implications for Grading and Prognosis:

    • Tumors with <5 mitoses/10 HPFs may behave like WDLPS.

    • Suggests these should not be called DDLPS or graded using FNCLCC unless they meet mitotic threshold.


Reference: Does “Low-Grade” Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma Exist? The Role of Mitotic Index in Separating Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma From Cellular Well-differentiated Liposarcoma The American Journal of Surgical Pathology 47(6):p 649-660, June 2023. | DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000002037


Case credit: UCSD Pathology

Author: Wangpan Jackson, Shi, MD




Recent Posts

See All
Case 147

A 60 year old male with an anal biopsy. What's your interpretation? A: Metaplasia B: LSIL C: HSIL D: SCC Answer The correct answer is C....

 
 
 
Case 146

A 54-year-old female with a large uterine mass What's the diagnosis? A: Fumarate hydratase deficient leiomyoma B: Dissecting leiomyoma C:...

 
 
 
Case 145

A 54-year-old female with multiple bone lesions. What's the molecular findings of this lesion? A: FUS-CREB fusion B: EWSR1-FLI1 fusion C:...

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page